When it comes to whether levying congestion pricing is an ideal way to do so, the issue has triggered a heated discussion. Considering that people are conspicuously influenced by taxes, it is advisable to implement this policy.
As Claire claims, taxes play a linchpin role for individuals, significantly guiding their behaviors. Therefore, people who have to enter the city center need to assess the pros and cons while commuting. This can contribute to the appropriate travel strategies. For instance, an employee who has a business cooperation negotiation in the city will tend to take public transportation in order to reduce the financial burden. Moreover, he might avoid peak hours for commuting, which directly alleviates the core problem. Obviously, the policy not only addresses the congestion predicaments, but also successfully directs people's behaviors in a sustainable way, which leads to a virtuous cycle.
Although Andrew mentions the drawbacks of losing customers, with which I partially concur, he overlooks the fact that this is manageable by time scheduling and targeted online and telephone meetings.托福學術討論批改，原題丟失，直接給批改意見吧！謝謝