搜索

逐词逐句精细批改,不规范表达改进,全文润色,详细评分分析,500字以上写作指导
创建于:2024-05-30 07:48:11
圈里有谁
最热
BoththereadingandthelisteningpassagedelveintothetopicofwaystocontrolthespreadofinvasiveseastarsfromtheNorthernPacificbecausethiscreaturethreatensthemarineecosystems.Significantly,thelisteningmaterialcontradictsthereadingbypresentingthreecounterarguments.First,Themethodthatthereadingclaimstointroduceisbyusingapoison,namedquicklime.Byapplyingthisway,seastarscanlargelybeeliminatedwithouthurtingmarinefloraandfauna.However,thelisteningchallengesthisstatementbyarguingthatthiscannoteffectivelystopthegrowingofseastars.Quicklimecannotonlykillseastars,butitalsodestroynativestars,whicharecriticalinmaintainingtheeco-systeminthearea.Oncethequicklimewasappliedtothefloor,itremainactiveandsoonkilltheseastars.Thenativestarssoongrowtothespacesthatseastarsusedtoliveandthendietoo.Moreover,parasitesareconsideredtobeanefficientwayoferadicatingseastars.Duetothelackofnaturalenemies,seastarsthriveinremoteplaces.Basedonnativeenvironmentalinspections,malestarsaresusceptibletoparasites,whichcontinuouslyattackmalestars'reproductivesystems.Thus,theoverallpopulationiswell-controlled.Thelisteningrefutesthisassertionbyhighlightingthattheseparasitescannotfullydestroythereproductiveabilityofstars.Theystillfertilizeandgiveeggsupto20million.Obviously,theimpactisnotvalid.Finally,ballastwater,whichreferstowaterthatseastarlarvaesticktoballastpumps,isdeemedasaworkableway.Shipsloadthemabroad,contributingtothespreadofseastars.Withtheapplicationofchemicalmaterialsonships,larvaearepreventedfrombeingcarriedtootherplaces.Fromtheperspectiveofthelistening,suchalternativecannotachievethegoalaspeopleimagine.Notonlydolarvaesticktolarge-sizeships,buttheyalsoattachtootherobjectsinsea,suchasfishingboats.Therefore,undernocircumstancescanpeopleeliminatethembyimplementingthisoption.
学霸君_56
4.Somepeoplesaythatgivingaidtopoorcountrieshasmorenegativeeffectsthanpositiveeffects.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Somepeoplearguethatprovidingsupporttolow-incomecountrieswouldgeneratemoredrawbacksthanbenefits,andIfirmlyagreewiththisopinion.Admittedly,poorcountriesthatreceivesupportfromothercountrieswillhavemoreresourcestoboosttheireconomy.Reasonswhysomecountriesarepoorcanbevarious,suchasthelackofnaturalresources,theinconvenienttransportationandundevelopedtechnologies.Consideringthat,resourcestheyacquirefromothercountries,includingdirectfinancialassistance,fundamentalinfrastructureconstruction,aswellaseducationalresourcesinput,willimprovetheireconomyfromdifferentperspectives.Therefore,gettingaidfromothercountriescanbebeneficialforlow-incomecountries.Nevertheless,acknowledgingthebenefitofthatbehaviordoesnotnecessarilypresumethatitbringsnodrawbacks.Firstly,countriesreceivingaidmayhaverelianceontheexternalassistance.Asmentionedabove,reasonsforcountriesbeingpoorcanbevarious,whereasnoneofthemcanbetackledinashorttime.Hence,whenreceivingtheexternalsupport,theymayhavedifficultytouseitproperly.Thesituationcanbeevenworseiftheydonotrealizethattheirfinancialburdenwillnotbeeasedonlybyreceivingaidfromothercountries,inthatcase,poorcountriesmayrelymoreondevelopedcountriesandlosetheirpatiencetofigureouttheirowncompetitiveness.Secondly,aidproviderscanalsofacepoliticalpressureduetotheirextraresources’allocationoutsidetheircountries.Forthosecountries,manytaxpayersmaybelievethatthedutyofgovernmentsistoinvestinfieldsthatarehighlyconcernedbytaxpayers,suchasmedicalandwelfare,whileprovidingassistancetootherpoorcountrieswillmakegovernmentsrunoutofmoney.Afterall,bothdirectfinancialsupportandinfrastructureconstructionarequitecostly.Thus,governmentsmayreceivecomplaintsfromcitizens,whichmayleadtopoliticalissues.Inconclusion,althoughprovidingaidtopoorcountrieswillimprovelow-incomecountries’economy,itwillalsobringdrawbackstocountriesthatreceiveandgiveassistance,respectively.
Belle
ThelinegraphdepictsthepricechangeofbananasinJapan,France,GermanyandUSAduring1994and2004.ItisclearthatthepriceofbananasinJapanandUSAsawanincreasein2004,comparedwiththatin1994,whereasthefigureforFranceandGermanysawadecreasein2004comparingwiththatin1994.Notably,thepriceofbananasinJapanhasremainedthetoponerankinginmostoftimeduringtheperiod.Tobeginwith,1994sawthepriceofbananasinJapanrecordedthehighestatUS$1.9perkilogram,followedbyfigureforFranceandGermanyatUS$1.7andUS$1.4perkilogram,andthefigureforUSAreachedlowestatUS$0.8perkilogram.AlthoughthefigureforJapansurgedatUS$2.9perkilogramin1995,itdroppedtoUS$2.0perkilogramin1996andkeptstablewithintherangeofUS$1.9-2.2perkilogramduring1996-2000.In2001,thepriceofbananasinJapansawadecreaseandreachedatUS$1.6perkilogram,andforthefirsttime,thefigureforFrancesurpasseditatUS$1.6perkilogram.However,thefigureforJapankeptincreasingforthenext3yearsandarrivedatUS$2.5perkilogramin2004.Movingtoanotherupwardline,wecanseethepriceofbananasinUSAshowedincreasefromUS$0.8perkilogramin1994toUS$1.2perkilogramin1995,andthefigurekeptwithintherangebetweenUS$1.1toUS$1.2overthenext9-yearperiod.Meanwhile,1994-1999witnessedthepricesofbananasinFranceandGermanykeepingstableattherangeofUS$1.7-1.8perkilogramandofUS$1.3-1.5perkilogram,respectively.Inthelast5years,figuresforFrancedroppedtwiceandforonetime,reachedthesamefigureforGermanyatUS$1.3perkilogramin2000,andforanothertime,decreasedtoUS$1.0perkilogramin2003.However,theperiodof2000-2004sawthestabletendencyoffigureforGermany,remainingwithintherangeofUS$1.2-1.4perkilogram.
Belle